• Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Honestly, that’s the real problem here. No one would complain about a patch, if they could freely decide to play with it or not…

        • Jako301@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Because Bethesda doesn’t provide the legacy versions on steam, unlike other mod focused games, afaik. Once you’ve updated your game, you are stuck with whatever version you have.

          Sure, you can always download the right version from somewhere else, but I wouldn’t count piracy + the risks coming with it as a viable excuse for their fuckup.

          • systemglitch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You can still access the legacy versions if you learn how to download the old steam depo manifest that is always archived.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    A company fares to continue providing support and free updates at the same time other companies are shutting down servers and pulling games out of people’s libraries, yet haters still find ways to complain.

    • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The game in question is Fallout 4. It’s a single-player game with zero online components.

      Just like with Morrowind, Oblivion, and Skyrim, as well as Fallout 3 and New Vegas mod support is an actual feature of the game with officially released tools and documentation for creating mods.

      Given that, the fact that mod support was a major selling point for the game (IMO the only selling point), and the age of the game, it would have been better if Bethesda stopped supporting the game altogether rather than push updates with no meaningful changes that break a feature that for some people is the primary feature of the game.

      • paultimate14@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        I would strongly disagree that modding was a major selling point considering that it released for consoles without mods for the same price.

        • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          What kind of masochist buys Bethesda games on a platform that can’t support mods? Dafuq

          • efstajas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The console versions totally have mod support, albeit limited. The most important mods like the unofficial patch are there.

          • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yeah wow who would do such a thing? Certainly not the ~30 million people that bought non-pc copies of Skyrim, right?

            What a cringe ass “pcmr” douchebag comment.

          • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Most people.

            Also the majority of people even on PC play vanilla. When will people who mod understand this. MOST PEOPLE DON’T MOD. That’s not even counting the people who did mod when they had the time to fuck around with stuff like that and no longer do, like myself.

            • paultimate14@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I fell into both.

              Bought Skyrim on PS3 a few months after it came out. Had an absolute blast and it immediately became a favorite for my wife and me. The load times were terrible and there were bugs, but the bugs were usually just funny visual glitches. The DLC came out and was fantastic - I still wish they released more.

              Eventually built a new gaming PC. My wife really wanted to try the earlier ES games so we bought the physical PC pack with all of them in it. The load times were way better with an SSD. The graphics and frame rate were way better. At that point patches had fixed a lot of the bugs.

              I tried some mods and found that most of them aren’t even worth the time it takes to browse for. 80% are just adding softcore porn that ruins the aesthetic. Another % are shit posts like replacing dragons with a model of Thomas the Tank Engine or replacing bears with Shrek- funny for maybe 30 seconds but not worth actually playing. 5% are other weapons that are just overpowered. The I’d guess about 4% are decent UI and graphics mods, some of which have since been rendered obsolete by newer editions. Probably <1% is actually good new content that I’d want to play, but even most of that isn’t as good as the base game.

              It’s a similar situation with tabletop homebrew. Everyone and their mother thinks they have some great ideas, but in practice they usually aren’t as fun as the main product. It’s hard to compete with a corporation spending millions of dollars to pay people to work things out.

              Add in how annoying it is to mod and how, even without any updates, it tends to break things. Skyrim has a reputation for being a broken and buggy game, but in my experience on multiple platforms (I eventually got the Switch and PS4 versions too lol) it’s really pretty solid. Back in the day when it was common to see posts complaining about how buggy the game was, 90% of the time you could dig into it and find that the OP was using a crap ton of mods.