• Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      NM is multi-platform, ie, linux is an afterthought, after Windows.

      That’s what you said, right? That multi-platform apps put Linux last. Seems pretty clear you don’t know what you’re talking about.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Multi platform apps often do a shoddy job of fully and/or properly supporting linux, this is very common.

        So common that WINE and Proton exist, to just reroute around that problem without forcing every software dev to also become a linux software dev.

        The NM is yet another example of that, its honestly not even really remarkable, its to be expected from devs that are entirely used to developing on windows.

        Do some linux devs also do a bad job of properly supporting a full array of DEs? X11 vs Wayland?

        Yep, that’s pretty common as well, this is why many serious distros at least attempt to pick sets of prebundled software, that work best with the DEs and WMs they support fully support, or even develop their own apps, or contribute to apps they like, such that the overall user experience on their distro is less janky and more congruent.

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            No?

            Krita picks a DE lane, stays with it, and it works well?

            I run Krita on a Gnome DE fairly often… works fine?

            I’ve never noticed a serious problem.

            Its got detailed build documentation if you want to build it, its got an appimage that actually works, a flatpak that works fine.

            You are the one that brought up DE support as an analogy to… the actual core functions of an app working or not working properly.

            Krita has no problems on either of those fronts… its entirely possible to get an app from basically one DE working in another in a fairly straightforward to the user way, if you know how to actually properly set up an app image or flatpak… which the Krita team does.

            Like uh, if you picked an older, buggier app designed for KDE, that hasn’t been updated in a decade, and barfs all over modern KDE or Gnome or w/e then yeah, yeah I’d say that app is no longer well supported on linux, in general, as most linux users generally use at least a fairly recent version of either Gnome or KDE.

            You’re just fully committing to your red herring / non sequitur argument here, not really sure why.