updated maxim

  • Mr Fish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    Probably “with great power comes no accountability, and therefore great responsibility”. It’s the lack of accountability that means responsibility is needed.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    3 days ago

    I always thought the bigger miss of the common phrase is this: If “With great power comes great responsibility” then the converse must also be true “With NO POWER comes NO responsibility”. The level of responsibility must scale in direct proportion to the amount of power you have. If your boss is blaming you for something you have little to no control over, then it isn’t your responsibility, and you deserve no blame.

    Your manager saying “You need to find someone to cover your shift” would then be bullshit. Unless you have the power to hire additional staff, allow for allowed time off for regular life events, or increase the pay of staff to make others more readily want to take the shift, I don’t see enough power for it to be your responsibility.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not seeing a correlation only argument here. Where would there be correlation without causation with what I’ve posted?

        • kambusha@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I understood it as power causes responsibility, and therefore, no power means no responsibility. If they’re just correlated, then there’s no way of knowing if no power is also correlated with no responsibility.

          • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 hours ago

            I understood it as power causes responsibility, and therefore, no power means no responsibility.

            I agree with this.

            If they’re just correlated, then there’s no way of knowing if no power is also correlated with no responsibility.

            If you’re using that line of thought, then I’ll also agree with you that there would be strong correlation with “no power equals no responsibility”, but I’m not sure how that fact is helpful or moves us forward in a line of thinking. When someone cites the argument of “correlation vs causation” usually means “we can’t tell if its actually causation. Its possible its just correlation”. Yet here we agree it is unambiguously causation. Your first sentence in this post encapsulate this perfectly.

            “I understood it as power causes responsibility”. cause = causation

            This is why I was confused with your citation of the “correlation vs causation” argument.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      I mean as I read that, it immediately made me think of the scene in the first Spider-Man when he goes after the guy who killed Uncle Ben and accidentally kills him.