In the wrong community

Yes and I believe this isn’t really a showerthought

You’re in the right lemmy instance I see

https://mander.xyz/post/20289088

I’d still argue against that. I’ve had one true showerthought and it didn’t manifest as monologue, even though I do have an internal monologue. I had a concept and images for it. I spent some time trying to put it into words.

I still don’t see how a showerthought (or any thought) has to have a verbal origin in the thinker’s mind; I would argue any internal monologue is but a secondary step after a thought has occurred. I’ve never heard of anyone being unable to predict what their own internal monologue is saying, and I’ve never heard of anyone being unable to make quick decisions because they had to first hear a command in their minds.

Just because you don’t have an inner monologue doesn’t mean you are incapable of thought, or showerthoughts if we’re getting specific

🤦 Well yes there’s always the fringe cases

People here saying consent (fair enough) but let me tell you, clothes are suggestive. There is more to suggestion and context than the actual content. Is anybody shocked to see a nude statue in a museum or something? Or in a painting? Now how about somebody wearing nothing but a g-string and a harness? You can argue the harnessed person in a gstring is less exposed than any nude. I say no. Clothing adds to the exposure sometimes. Underwear isn’t meant to be seen, so when it’s seen, it prompts judgement.

Love this showerthought

I’m not picking a yt link, but just replying to the title: streaming wasn’t a mistake. Price creep and content fragmentation (needing a subscription for every studio out there) was the mistake

😌👌

Nice. Is there an europe cheese? ( Not “European”, but “europe”)

But not in a cheddar!

But not buildings!

What makes you think it’s the building naming the cheese and not the cheese naming the building? Why can’t we live in roqueforts, in masdaams, in cheddars?

This is the thing… Adding insult to injury, the outcome of this is going to be (if it plays in Disney’s favor) a paid model in which generating characters resembling Disney’s will cost extra. So they will steal and profit

Okay, I’ll oblige.

How do you know they are a “sir”?

Whaaaaa? Shame on them especially since they had events going. Would have been easier to just not have any events if you were going to cancel in like ten days

Some, yes, but that was not the case when photography emerged- the time when paintings were the way of showing and recording what things looked like.

Even today, most food porn photos are of prepared meals, not so much harvests which was the classic still life subject back then. I’d risk saying most people prefer paintings of harvested goods to photos even today, although you do have photos of them of course. Finally… People use paintings to embellish their homes and to display their wealth, which is not the case with insta images.

Nobody cared to photograph apples in a bowl or flowers. It was obvious the photographs were nowhere near as interesting as paintings unless you were particularly gifted with lights and a camera.

Personal portraits on the other hand, were far more useful on everyday basis and more accurate as photographs, even if some glamour was sacrificed in the trade off.

That’s true but OP is making a point that people who were abused by their parents are a relatively common minority, as opposed to people abused by Santa Claus or the Easter Bunny which, for sure, there may be some out there but probably not that many.