Like what exactly?

Lowkey surprised Cloudflare didn’t just drop the website to unblock access to their other customers

This ^. To elaborate, download Flatseal

Opening the browser is done through an XDG portal. Bottles forwarded the request to your desktop environment.

Bottles (and anything running in Bottles) can’t arbitrarily read your files, but it can request a file picker dialog. Similarly, it can’t read or modify Firefox, but it can request a URL to open

Was wondering earlier this week when their next release would be!

Helps all of wine:

ntsync driver to handle Windows locking types enabling Wine to work much better on many workloads (i.e. games). The driver framework was in 6.13, but now it’s enabled and fully working properly. Should make many SteamOS users happy. Even comes with tests!

On Gmail, you can configure emails to not send until 30s after you click Send. It gives you time to “undo” the send

I had a friend like you. One time he held his drink in an awkward position and I told him “don’t throw that at me”. He proceeded to throw his drink all over the table and me.

Anyways it’s a good way to live life is all in saying

As someone who’s always been side loading apps and doing custom configs, it’s just so much harder compared to what it used to be. So many hidden settings. So many menus you have to go through in the right order. So many reverts that happen each update.

You say it’s in the name of security, but I don’t see it. Something is fundamentally broken here, if Google really believes this is the best path forward

Edit: and btw, I work in big tech too. I know how this update came to be. Some L6 looking for his packet decided to “decrease infected devices by 10%” by adding this friction, and everyone nodded along since the negative impact isn’t measurable.

Just a place where people can call out and crowdsource lies that news outlets publish

So I read through this, and unfortunately there’s nothing concrete. Every error has been corrected, and the errors that remain are opinion pieces which can’t be listed as a source on Wikipedia. Due to WP:RECENT, this means no place where Wikipedia refers to the New York Times as a source will be asserting incorrect information.

This probably isn’t the response you want, but that’s the truth about their reporting.

Edit: If you still want to try and bring it up, this is what I had written in my draft:

The following article has been brought to my attention: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13537121.2024.2394292#abstract

While the issues raised in this paper tend to focus on bias, and factual errors were later corrected in many cases (which should be suffice due to WP:RECENT), the section of "Misquoting Israeli leaders" refers to multiple errors in reporting from the New York Times that remain uncorrected.

~~~~

(This is before I noticed the uncorrected parts are Opinion pieces, so I stopped)

You can post it here, but you will probably be shut down for the same reasons I mentioned above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard

I used to edit Wikipedia for a long time, so I know what you’re saying - but if you’re actually correct, you’ll generally win (may require pinging some other people who know you to come in to mediate)

I see your sources. I will check Wikipedia to see if there has been discussion on it, if not, I will bring it up and get back to you.

(On phone right now so I can’t)

EDIT: Will not be posting this on Wikipedia, see response in https://lemmy.ml/post/23416718/15472127

Being pro genocide is an opinion technically. If you have a “flagrant lie”, however, please post it. There was another wanker in the thread who claimed equal grand claims of lies but failed to come up with a link showing an actual lie

Ah yes, beep boop

You’ll find “common knowledge” is surprisingly hard to prove when you’re wrong. Wikipedia is a big place, if you can find concrete evidence of NYT lying, you can do a lot of reputational damage to them (even as so far as getting them removed as an acceptable source)

If you have evidence of them lying, you’re more than welcome to submit that on the discussion pages. I don’t know which articles you’re referring to, but given my historical knowledge of wars in the Middle-East, they likely sourced US mouthpieces or analysts, rather than making the claims themself

News outlets are generally graded by their historical reputabilitiy. If you find yourself continuously fact checking it, maybe consider following a better news outlet (even if they publish more “boring” stories that aren’t as “up to date”): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources

I would also love to see a better place for keeping news outlets accountable for their bad publishing actions. Wikipedia does, but it happens on discussion pages and it relies on human editors who know where those discussions happened to string it together

Give us stories!!!

My only request is make it so that in April Fools you can play as Windows and it’s slow af