Lemmy.ml has a reputation for really bad takes, and the mods and admins ban people for not supporting the admins’ favorite genocides.
Cripple. History Major. Irritable and in constant pain. Vaguely Left-Wing.
Lemmy.ml has a reputation for really bad takes, and the mods and admins ban people for not supporting the admins’ favorite genocides.
I’m going to hold my nose and vote for Kamala but I won’t shame people who can’t bring themselves to do it.
It must be nice, being privileged enough to see who wins this election as a fashion choice instead of something that will affect your life.
Because it’s an election with consequences, not an online fandom.
Not to most of these people pushing third-parties.
No, no, THIS time protest-voting to allow fascism will work to usher in a real left-wing movement in this country, promise! /s
I’m in this entire comment section and I don’t like it
Didn’t say we shouldn’t. Explicitly said it was a good step.
Wealth is just one means of power. Destroying all billionaires, while a good step, would not even come close to solving almost every problem in the world.
RE1/Veronica Chris < Leon < RE5 or RE8 Chris
In terms of who would crush who, at least.
A Greek idiom meaning “To make your life hard” according to the comments on the author’s page.
I’m more familiar with like, Chivalry or Conqueror’s Blade, where that’s a problem.
It’s common in multiplayer games for there to be a gate or the like that can be opened and closed, and a common mistake is some new player leaving it open when it should be closed. This is translated in the pic to streaming in an actual medieval scenario with a very anachronistic gyaru landsknecht and other female soldiers, because Centurii-chan likes drawing women.
Just ‘Toyota War’ as a modern, car-oriented war, and ‘War of the Roses’ as a medieval war, smashed together, nothing deeper to it. I saw it in a comment on the artist’s facebook page for this image and thought it’d make a good title.
No XD
It’s more like “We found the guy pulling the lever on the trolley problem, only his trolley problem is ‘people die or I get less money’, and he has the trolley run over the people every time”
Unfortunately, there’s a long line of twats behind him drooling over their chance to make the trolley run over human beings in exchange for money, so killing him doesn’t really have the ‘trolley running over people averted’ effect that the trolley problem is usually based around. You’re just punishing a shithead killer by killing him. Which, while hilarious, lacks the moral quandary that the trolley problem is meant to highlight, since no one is actually saved.
It’s one of those things where the institutions of society can and must genuinely pursue the killer (albeit not at the level they actually are, expending a disproportionate amount of resources compared to if one of us commoners was killed), but if I saw the person who killed the CEO, I didn’t.