Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.
If you’re using just raw LXC it’s easy…
lxc-create <> -t oci -- --url docker://alpine:latest
Will spawn an alpine docker container for instance.
If you’re using something like proxmox though, it’s a little more annoying since there’s some work to get proxmox to add it to it’s container list.
Lxc doesn’t use oci images?
https://github.com/lxc/lxc/commit/0ef43a5c1d635835950335375f0dd71bf1abe384
It does.
Why bother asking for help if you’re not going to do the bare minimum of bringing us up to speed on what you’re running and how it’s configured. Just to be a complete jackass and “block” everyone the moment they ask for any of that information in order TO HELP YOU.
To this point the only facts we know…
Your running docker. You added two containers. One of which might be Hanabira. That were run via docker compose. SSH is working, but not… because you didn’t actually explain that well at all.
That’s it. That’s all you’ve provided and I had to literally read EVERY thread to find that. That’s all we got. Nobody can help you. And with people outright asking you for more, and your hostility in return to those trying to help you. Nobody else will want to help you. Including me.
Good luck. But I wanted you to know that you’re the jackass here.
It’s mildly funny though that you live up to your .ml instance preconceptions.
I’m not going to give you instructions simply because if you don’t know what you’re doing, you will brick your plex setup. Use the docker container given as a transparent proxy. You won’t brick anything that way.
HDHR isn’t getting keys
And yet mine does so somehow I’m special? I can open the streams just fine. No issues. In the other thread, I even linked you a project that does the ac4 transcoding. You think they’re also full of shit and that HDHR doesn’t work with ATSC 3.0?
The Siliconlabs guys even advertise the product as ATSC3.0 compatible… Are they full of shit too?
The decryption keys are on the HDHR itself… The HDHR calls home every few hours to pick up new keys.
That’s an ffmpeg issue. You can manually upgrade ffmpeg to the beta and it works fine. Or you can use an interposer like https://github.com/whichken/hdhr-ac4 to do it without touching plex itself.
So yes it doesn’t “support” it properly… but that doesn’t mean it’s not possible. Nor does that mean your antenna is useless.
This makes an antenna useless. And the only digital boxes that are allowed are ones that have to be plugged into the TV directly with HDMI. This means you’d have to have an antenna and expensive converter box for EACH TV.
https://shop.silicondust.com/shop/product-category/atsc/?scrollto=663475
Weird that you’d say something like that when it’s completely untrue.
I have ATSC 3.0 channels in my plex setup right now…
raise my 20-bay storage server.
I raise you my 72 bay monster… https://www.ebay.com/itm/126301431412
But I have 512 GB of ram in mine…
I’m the one that had to clear it… I’m pretty sure putting my face within 3 ft of the bowl uniquely qualifies me to talk about how much toilet paper was in the bowl.
This was it when I was in the military. Requisition the nice stuff? Joe’s took it home.
Single ply? They break through with their fingers after 1/4 of the wipe, but I didn’t have to order nearly as much of it.
As a father… of 2 girls… and a wife. I promise, you’re wrong.
I have three of those super flush toilets. I cannot clog it… I’ve completely filled the fucking thing with shit and it flushes. The other gender in the house? They’ve done it twice so far. We’ve had this house for about 8 months now. I’m baffled.
Edit: Typos
there is a easy way to synchronize your YouTube and PeerTube channel
No there isn’t anymore. yt-dlp, what all those syncing tools rely one, is basically fucked at this point. Youtube has made it fucking impossible to grab content off their platform and it’s really damn annoying. Even for my private IP address, I’ve earned what seems to be a permanent ban from Youtube.
Every video shows either this…
Or I login, and it only shows me the first 60 seconds of content before it just buffer loops forever
But I wouldn’t want to sync the content from youtube anyway… Youtube compresses the shit out of everything.
I get your point. It’s not hard for them to make a second post of the same video content to another platform. Many just don’t see the value in it. I agree that at least FUTO should see the point of putting it up… Hell I’m even willing to share the load in the bandwidth (with my own instance that’s currently up and running). Is what it is.
Well yeah… those are the only ones that matter.
Correct. It can’t go anywhere because you won’t acknowledge that a dockerfile is literally just a script. So arguing that one type of script is any different than any other type of script is just silly from the get-go. Not sure what point you’re trying to prove. Also, “one-off” literally linked you to a whole thing of “one-off” LXC containers and you still say dumb shit like this…
You can version LXC containers.
Every command (https://docs.docker.com/build/concepts/dockerfile/) is literally just an alias of something from linux bash anyway. So I’m really not understanding why you think there’s any difference here. It’s literally a dumbed down bash for one specific purpose.
I’m starting to think you just don’t know anything about docker. Or LXCs for that matter.
If so, that’s pathetic and weird.
Pathetic and weird is complaining about downvotes when they don’t even tally up anywhere. So not only were they meaningless to begin with, they’re not even as useful as they are on Reddit.
I did downvote, not because of disagreeing with me, but because
The issue with LXC is that it doesn’t set the software up for you.
is factually wrong in this context. You can absolutely distribute software in an LXC. I even pointed you directly at one such repository of hundreds of images that do exactly that. And they’re repeatable and troubleshoot-able all the same. The script that a dev would publish would be doing literally the same exact thing as a dockerfile.
A dockerfile is just a glorified script. Treating it as if it’s something different is intellectually dishonest. Anything in a docker can be edited/modified the same as an LXC. docker exec -it <> /bin/bash puts a user in the same position as being in an LXC container. Once again. Aside from some additional networking stuff, Docker was literally based on LXC and is more or less functionally the same. Even in their own literature they only claim that they’ve enhanced LXC by adding management to it… (https://www.docker.com/blog/lxc-vs-docker/) Except Proxmox can manage an LXC just fine… LXD as well.
As far as CI/CD stuff… It works on LXC containers as well… Here’s an example from 3 years ago that I found literally in 10 seconds searching for LXC ci/cd https://gitlab.com/oronomo/docker-distrobuilder.
Also you can even take a DOCKERFILE and other OCI compliant images and push them directly into an LXC natively. https://www.buzzwrd.me/index.php/2021/03/10/creating-lxc-containers-from-docker-and-oci-images/ (Create LXC containers using docker images section).
like pretty much the entire development community does?
This is also a bullshit appeal/fallacy. The VAST majority of development communities don’t use ANY form of containerization. It’s only a subset that works on cloud platforms that now push into it… It’s primarily your exposure to self-hosted communities that makes you believe this. But it’s far (really far) from true. Most developers I work with professionally have no idea what docker is other than maybe have heard about it from somewhere or another. It’s people like me who take their shit and publish it into a container and show them that they understand and learn more about it. And even in that environment, production tends to not be in docker at all (usually kubernetes, Openshift, Rancher, or other platforms that do not use the Docker Runtime) but that choice is solely up to the container publisher.
I didn’t like docker for the longest time
Good for you? I see docker as a useful tool for some specific stuff. But there’s very few if any cases where I would take Docker over an LXC setup, even in production. I don’t hate or love docker (or LXC for that matter). However… I find I get better performance, lower overhead, and better maintainability with LXC. So that’s what I use. I don’t delude myself that LXCs are somehow not containers… and that Docker does anything different than any other container platform.
They did… That’s why there’s timestamps in the description.
Docker doesn’t setup anything for you either without a dockerfile (which is literally just a list of commands to setup the docker container).
There’s no reason that a script cannot be used in the exact same way for an LXC container. To that point… There’s already a repo of stuff to do exactly that. Which I’ve linked above.
Edit:
A docker is a distribution method for the software, not the operating system
And yet most docker containers first lines are something line “FROM Alpine”… Much the same that an LXC would be. Last I checked Alpine is an OS…
Keep in mind that docker used to be based on LXC… and they fulfill virtually the same niche, outside of Docker having more obfucated shit for networking (specifically inter-container networking).
It’s funny because I view LXC’s the same. They’re more practical than both VMs and dockers to me. Outside of community-scripts though, it seems most people don’t like LXC’s nearly as much as I do…
Especially on a private tracker where the primary intent is to keep malicious actors out to begin with. Nobody wants MPA, RIAA, or other media org people on their tracker.