These same discussion happened with photoshop and “brush tools” why are those acceptable to make it less labor intensive, but this isn’t?

It’s more hypocrisy over purism, as you’ve so nicely pointed out.

What have you debunked?

The same “repeating” can be said to you, and is probably why you’re projecting more fallacies onto me.

Ant “debunking” you’ve done, is to justify your bias that certain tools to replace humans are okay. And that’s obviously a hypocrital take, so what’s your real issue here? Just like anyone else, the term “ai” is just a trigger and you don’t like it? It to have it poured to your already “acceptable” tools make you go “REE”?

These same conversations were had with luddites like you when spellcheck came out, than PS, than grammarly. And guess what? They’re acceptable in everyday use.

The same will happen with AI as people treat more like a tool than a toy. Than jackasses like you will be left behind again, but then try and justify it like you are beee when the next one comes out.

Hypocritical Luddites like you are just the worst kind of fucking people.

Says the hypocrite that says one tool that replaces humans is okay, but not another.

Okay buddy, just because you can’t make a coherent argument or come up with a legitimate reason why one’s acceptable doesn’t make me slow. If anything just shows how flawed and fucked your reasoning is.

People have always used tools to replace humans. So this decry NOW over ai is what’s bullshit. They shouldn’t enable to use PS brush tools either. Same process, same outcome, the ai can actually be able to do more and remove labor. But now “that’s” not okay. This is what me and other users are pointing out.

But your “ai bad” bias, has made you ignorant to any actual discussions.

If you don’t want ai, than you don’t want grammarly, spellcheck, auto correct, PS or any other tool. If you do, you’re frankly a bloody Luddite hypocrite.

Different tools with different costs and different outcomes.

Both have replaced human labor, why are bringing up costs? No one’s mentioned that, gotta use fallacies to justify the hypocrisy? The outcomes the same. Use less human labor to make art.

But sure justify one while decrying the other, hypocrite.

You seem to be missing the point that’s been made here since your ignorance is “ai bad”.

A tools a tool, any tool can be abused. So it’s a very hypocrital view to say these tools are acceptable, but make up arbitrary reasons why those ones aren’t. That’s what’s being done here, and why people are trying to shift the conversation focus to the “tool itself”.

Since even photoshop, grammarly, or any other non-ai tool is labour a usable too.

If we want humans doing stuff, why is a brushing tool acceptable? It’s not a human doing the work. So yeah the views here are extremely hypocritical.

Ah, so this kind of tool is allowable, but not another? Pretty hypocritical thinking there.

A tools is a tool, any tool can be abused.

deleted by creator

Why do you think grammarly is a thing dude…?

People ALREADY use an llm for spellcheck, and it’s acceptable, yet this crosses a line…? You say people won’t use one… yet it’s already been a thing for years, your ignorance is i ionic as shit here.

It’s always funny what people will find acceptable, but also balk at when it’s fundamentally the exact same thing.

Of these devs want to claim “no ai” and everything is human, than they can’t rely on spellcheck either. Both are automated tools no?

A tool is a tool dude. Why are you trying to justify one over the other?

What do you think grammarly is dude? Glorified spell and auto check, which people already utilize everyday. But of course new tools are looked down upon, the hypocrisy of people is amazing to see. It comes in cycles, people hated spell check, got used to it and now it’s prominent in every life, autocorrect, same thing is happening.

And now the same is happening again. If they want to claim no ai, no spellcheck, no auto correct, and no grammarly for emails. Everyone already uses “AI” everyday. But theirs is acceptable… okay…

Then you better give up spellcheck and autocorrect.

What about situations that are different under observation than not? It doesn’t actually cover every single case. No single rule ever COULD.

deleted by creator

So be like SteamWorld? I love their concept, as long as it’s well done.

I had one that took a few minutes to preheat, and others that you just toss the stuff in.

But yeah, it’s a marginal time with that one I would just start it and than go grab what I want to cook and it’ll be ready by then usually.

It’s more like adding a leaf blower to it, but yeah it’s just a glorified convection oven.

Lots of modern ovens come with the feature, but you can’t just air fry in any old convection oven.

Okay, so you agree that they have limitations on their hours? Thats the issue of the discussion, some in certain places may need to be closed at 4, and can only open at 8. That’s the limitations of whatever agreements they have with their landlord and municipality. Shit sucks sometimes. But no, business can’t choose their hours, that’s a fallacy, almost all of them have some limitations, like open and close hours due to noise bylaws, or zoning issues with closeness to residential areas.

JUST LIKE YOUR BUSINESS DOES……

No they weren’t, only a select few in most cities were, zoning and bylaws played large roles first.

Not everything is a conspiracy dude.

I can’t think of a single city where all business can operate 24 hours, can you provide any?

Its zoning laws, and you can be sure I’m not going to assed to go through any municipalities zoning laws to see when each class of business can be allowed to be open.

Very few businesses are 24/7, not even Walmarts in most cities. Please provide a municipality that says a deli shop can operate 24/7, because some would if they could, but plenty are forced to close before bars are closed and the rest usually an hour after… its not because they want to, its because their specific zoning laws disallow it.

Your original claim

We can’t control our work hours for the most part, a business owner can.

A business owner unfortunately has rules to follow on their hours, you claimed otherwise first, so you need to provide the sources, you can’t back out of this one.

A business owner has rules and regulations to follow, you can take a day or some time off to support your local business if you care enough about them.

Cant operate if the municipality won’t give you a permit since you can’t follow the rules.

It’s likely their passion job while they work another job in that scenario.

So yeah it’s probably not profitable for them to be open that 30 more minutes, you could be the only extra customer, and you can’t seriously think one potential customer once in while could justify that do you?

And how am I demonizing laziness? Taking time off to support local businesses is lazy? The fuck…?