Can you prevent someone from setting up local instances of Deepseek? It’s open source. How would this define Chinese models?

Agreed. Avakian is fascinating because he’s so entitled in the article. If someone doesn’t want to buy his product he just rails against how unfair they were to him.

Bro: it’s business. If your product were nearly as good as you claim it is, you wouldn’t need to force people into using it.

Also, the end of the article points out that Walgreens has been terribly mismanaged and is a very low-performing company, and they’re still experimenting with screens, just not with Avakian. Hilarious.

This got a chuckle outta me.

But it do be true that Big Old runs the world.

A conspiracy among whom?

Who were the folks in a dark room saying, ‘Listen boys: we’re here to uphold outdated gender norms. But to work, it’s all gotta be hush-hush, capiche?’

Maybe one day we can get there, but right now it might be better for a lot of folks if the default was “I’m not horny”.

But I’m with you on the dream.

I don’t know if this is a hot take, but I think allowing straight and cis people to identify as such is appropriate, because the alternative assumes that we live in a state of default heteronormativity.

If anything, I want to live in a world where homophobes get mad that if they want to be assumed to be straight online they have to identify like anyone else. No one gets assumed to be straight any more. That’s better imo.

I see Teslas in the bay area with bumper stickers that say things like “I didn’t know he was nuts when I bought this”

Vaguely relevant

Great show, and a great use of this character.

I came to add this.

I agree with you… but I don’t disagree with @john_mcmurray.

The fact that Biden actually participates in genocide at all is just ghastly. I honestly struggle to find the words for it. And once he crossed that bridge, I will never ever try to argue with someone who assigns him equal moral equivalence with Trump.

It’s like debating whether someone who killed one of your children is better than someone who killed two. Mathematically? I think so. Conceptually? Those are who child murderers. The difference is negligible.

There are still Palestinians alive right now, though, so we can’t give up, no matter how heartbroken.

This take gave me a chuckle.

A little yes and a little no.

I think all of these people are monsters, but I’m also trying to find the best option among bad options. If Harris is president, I can live with that. If Trump gets elected again… I think the possibility of Palestinians getting exterminated becomes a genuine possibility, and the damage to our climate and our ability to reverse course after four years look very fragile.

It’s very depressing.

I get where you’re coming from, but the meme is a joke, and this particular set of jokes doesn’t work if you do it that way.

The truth is, you didn’t need to convince me. I think Biden is a monster. The meme is a set of jokes written in the voice of a mainstream American political pundit, not a genuine reflection of my personal attitudes.

My personal attitudes are that every US president is a war criminal, and Biden, Bush, Cheney, and Blinken should be hauled off to the international criminal court.

Sadly, all the candidates are very big cops.

This is a common layman misconception. The term “hitler” isn’t actually based on how much the candidate engages in human rights abuses: it’s just a marker of how widely voters recognize them as “hitler-y” (to use the technical term).

A fun fact: within the field of meme political science it’s recognized that if we did apply a quantitative rubric, ALL of the US Presidents are actually hitlers!

Oof. I kinda would too, but also… boy that’d be an uncomfortable read.

Pure guess? 30% would pick Hitler… 15% would refuse to answer.

I don’t know if you can read the text easily on mobile, but there’s a joke in the text describing there about how he is indeed committing genocide.

The label says “Not a hitler?”.

The X means you fail at not being a hitler. Hitler fails this test.