• 2 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 19th, 2024

help-circle
  • I’m not talking about “AES”, I’m talking about communism. By the definition of “communism = AES” then communism doesn’t abolish class, private property, the value-form, nations, etc.

    Anarchism distinguishes itself from communism principally by an inherent opposition to hierarchy, and an opposition to many of the organisational forms that communists may advocate for or participate in, eg communist parties, councils, and any kind of structure that could constitute a hierarchy. And anarchists are inherently opposed to centralisation, and so on.







  • That’s why Nintendo wants to serve his family members cause they probably know he’s at one of them…and once he’s been served they’re responsible to send it to him or else they will be held accountable

    That’s not true. Nintendo wants to serve to family members because they (officially) haven’t been able to get through to him yet, and his family members may be able to contact him where Nintendo has not been able to.

    I also doubt the family members have any legal requirement to serve the papers to him. That would be a bit ridiculous. Imagine if some lawyer could hand you random court summons and now you’re legally required to find this person and serve the papers. You may say that it’s not the same situation because they’re related, but at what point are you related enough to a person where you can have this legal duty thrust upon you, especially given how most people have family members they’re not in direct contact with? He’s not criminally wanted; they wouldn’t be hiding a fugitive or whatever if they refuse to serve (assuming they even know where he is, which it’s perfectly plausible they don’t).

    In any case, it shouldn’t really matter. The streamer has demonstrated publicly that he’s aware of the lawsuit and at some point that will probably be deemed sufficient notice, possibly for the case to continue in his absence if he continues to be unresponsive.





  • I wouldn’t say that I go to the effort of making myself unidentifiable, but my “defaults” are with relative anonymity and privacy in mind anyway, ie donations in Monero, anti-fingerprinting, VPN, lack of persistent browser storage, full disk encryption. So I guess I don’t take steps because my regular browsing is already reasonably private, private enough that I don’t feel the need to take extra steps for minor shit like buying drugs online or donating to things. I do take extra steps to make sure there’s no simple way something can be traced to me for more serious stuff but I don’t think making a donation to a piracy website is serious.

    In terms of using paypal, unless it’s illegal or criminalised to donate to piracy in your country, it should be fine too. Normally it’s just actually pirating (or sometimes only distributing) that’s illegal so donating shouldn’t be prosecutable, again unless that actually is a law where you live.