davel [he/him]

Pronouns he/him
Datetime Format RFC 3339
  • 3 Posts
  • 425 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 8th, 2023

help-circle







  • Mozilla already has Scrooge McDuck amounts of money. It doesn’t need any more to maintain a browser and an email client.

    From jwz, who founded Mozilla & Firefox:

    .

    Mozilla had a duty to preserve the open web.

    Instead they cosplayed as a startup, chasing product dreams of “growth hacking”, with Google’s ad money as their stand-in for a VC-funding firehose, with absolutely predictable and tragic results.

    And those dreams of growth and market penetration failed catastrophically anyway.

    (Except for the C-suite, who made out quite well. And Google, who got exactly what they paid for: a decade of antitrust-prosecution insurance. It was never about ad revenue. The on-paper existence of Firefox as a hypothetical competitor kept the Federal wolves at bay, and that’s all Google cared about.)


    Now hear me out, but What If…? browser development was in the hands of some kind of nonprofit organization?

    As I have said many times:

    In my humble but correct opinion, Mozilla should be doing two things and two things only:

    1. Building THE reference implementation web browser, and
    2. Being a jugular-snapping attack dog on standards committees.
    3. There is no 3.




  • I happen to know jwz personally, and he knows Mozilla intimately: he founded it. His dislike of Mozilla is pretty much the same as mine, and he is neither “anti west” nor anti liberal. We dislike Mozilla because it has lost its way from being a FOSS browser maintainer and a booster for & steward of an open web.

    And I’m not “anti-West,” I’m anti-capitalist, anti-settler-colonialist, and anti-imperialist; and those happen to be things that “the West” presently embodies.









  • jwz three months ago: Mozilla is an advertising company now

    From the comments:


    Preemptive subtwit.

    Let’s say you run a nonprofit animal shelter. And for some reason, some people feel you should be seeing hockey-stick growth, but the donations aren’t covering it.

    So you decide to start up a side-line of selling kittens for meat.

    Then you will inevitably have someone stroking their chin and saying, 'Yes, yes, but how could they afford to stay open if they weren’t selling kitten deli slices?"

    Some might say – maybe you aren’t an animal shelter any more. Some might say.


    Mozilla has been financed by ads since 20 years. This pays the people working on the browser. 99% of the work is actually done by employees, not by volunteers. Acquiring that advertising company is the next logical step to get rid of Google (also financed by ads…) Instead of blaming shaming, we need to think about how to finance working on free software, as relying on unpaid work is not viable and brings issues with diversity.

    You are just another of those so-predictable people saying, “The animal shelter has always had a kitten-meat deli, why are you surprised?”

    Yes, Mozilla started making absolutely horrific funding and management decisions many years ago. Today, they have taken this subtext and turned it into the actual text. That’s news. Literal news.

    “Instead of blaming and shaming” – fuck that. I will absolutely and unapologetically blame them for the utter shame they bring on themselves.