I take it as people just joking. Personally I’m in doubt if the tweet is serious and the new book is true, or is it just a joke about refactoring/re-writing code.

After all, that’s why git is there, to help me remember the shit I put all over the place. (Ok, it might have some other uses.)

The other day I was having a bad day and had a call from an unknown number, so I decided to pick up but let them talk first. They just hang up and have not called again.

I don’t think it was a good idea to pick up in the first place, but it was curious in the end.

But you’ll at least let us take a smaller or bigger peek right? Don’t worry we have a screen recorder ready, you don’t have to do anything.

C pew pew

Outlook (new new new final)

cat

Ahhhhh, fuck. I’m quite noob with linux. I got into some rabbit hole trying to read the docs. I found 2 man pages, one is cat(1) and the other cat(1p). Apparently the 1p is for POSIX.

If someone could help me understand… As far as I could understand I would normally be concerned with (1), but what would I need to be doing to be affected by (1p)?

How you see your projects trying to accept that you might need to compromise.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator