Are there any restrictions on a FOSS instance? Is there a pay wall?

I’m been trying to stand up a zulip instance. It’s working but I haven’t used it much. I want a feature complete jitsi instance to go with it and that’s only partially implemented right now.

That said, zulip does seem like the best option for me presently.

Haven’t tried revolt.

Mattermost seems to be perpetually entangled but being disentangled from some other suite. Confusing and frustrating.

I haven’t tried rocket chat for 5 years or so. I think last time I read about it people were complaining that the FOSS plan is very limited.

Theres heaps of hosted nextcloud services. Those users wouldn’t know.

Do you really think someone is going to set up a MITM attack for the dozen people who visit this blog?

LOL. On the scale of risky things I’ve done today, visiting this guy’s http website barely rates a mention.

Someone posts about something they’ve learned and the best you can do is dump on them about whatever thing in order to demonstrate to everyone your superior knowledge.

Everyone starts somewhere.

Adding to what everyone else has already said, you want sync and backup.

Sync to a central location and backup from there.

For sync, you want syncthing or nextcloud. I would lean towards syncthing for media. If you had a million files in a complex folder structure and a dozen users with different access requirements and instant sync and collision protection is important then nextcloud might be the go. Otherwise syncthing is much more manageable.

My recommendation with syncthing, which is not obvious, is to set up a single hub which each client syncs with. By default you end up with a mesh where everything is connected to everything. It’s very difficult to manage with a lot of folders and devices. Turn off discovery and input the server / hub details manually.

For backup, if you have a lot of media you want deduplication. If yesterday’s backup included ABC and today’s is ABCD you only want to transfer D. This is similar to an incremental backup, but the subtle difference is that with deduplication the most recent backup is the “full backup” with the “diffs” going backwards in time, allowing you to purge old backups. I like borgmatic but there are others.

I would also consider carefully exactly what is worth backing up on what service. I don’t backup movies and tv series at all.

My final recommendation is, it’s critically important to test deploying your backups regularly.

Sure but thats an angular app, and you already know how to manage its environment.

People self host all sorts of things, with dozens of services in their home server.

They dont need to know how to manage the environment for these services because docker “makes everything so easy”.

I dont really understand the problem with that?

Everyone is a script kiddy outside of their specific domain.

I may know loads about python but nothing about database management or proxies or Linux. If docker can abstract a lot of the complexities away and present a unified way you configure and manage them, where’s the bad?

Not really.

Both docker and ufw edit iptables rules.

If you instruct docker to expose a port, it will do so.

If you instruct ufw to block a port, it will only do so if you haven’t explicitly exposed that port in docker.

Its a common gotcha but it’s not really a shortcoming of docker.

There’s a use case for this but who knows how big this niche is, and ultimately that’s what will determine success or failure.

I do use nextcloud for my small consultancy team but I dislike it immensely, mostly due to personal preferences.

I think I pretty much just don’t like having one platform that does everything. I want to self host my own cloud, I don’t want to self host a thing that provides a cloud.

Additionally, and this really is just a personal preference, I dislike php projects almost as much as Java.

Primarily I use nextcloud’s file sync. This aspect is IMO extremely well implemented. It seems to work very reliably.

We do use contacts and calendars. If there were good alternatives I would switch to them but sabreDav et al lacks a good UI. I’m aware you can disable this functionality in nextcloud.

Anything else that can potentially be integrated is better hosted separately IMO.

Sorry, I think that’s a fairly American take.

Money can exert influence on law makers, sure.

In my experience here in Australia though, courts are pretty good at interpreting the law without undue influence.

Mozilla guy saying there’s a risk, but i dont really see it, myself.

Firstly, does copyright really prevent modification for personal use? I dont think it does.

Secondly, you’re not so much modifying the content as not consuming part of it. I think thats an important distinction for the court to grapple with.

IIRC one of the reasons they discontinued support for android was because the other fork exists.

It’s not really clear exactly what you want.

When you’re at home, and for services running on your home server, it you want everything to go through the remote wireguard server then that’s achievable.

However, if you want to be able to access services running on your home server, while you’re not at home, via that remote wireguard server, that generally requires port forwarding which commercial providers generally don’t offer.

Can you clarify ?

I don’t use tailscale or gluetun. They’re probably good options I just wasn’t aware of them when I was setting up and what I’m doing now has worked great for years.

My home server has 4 containers you’re interested in:

wireguard_out

this is a wireguard instance which is connected to a mullvad server on a paid subscription.

For any containers I want to “use this vpn” I just attach them to this container’s stack. it’s one of the network options in docker. Notably these containers include qbittorrent and squid (below).

Wireguard configurations look unapproachable at first but it’s one of those things where messing around with it for an hour or so will serve you well for a lifetime. There’s not heaps more to learn. LLMs are great at writing wireguard configurations.

squid

This is a http proxy attached to the wireguard_out stack. You didn’t ask about this and may not need it but I’ve found it super useful.

One of the private torrent trackers I use will only let your torrent client connect to the tracker from the same IP address you used to download the torrent file - so when browsing their website you need to use the vpn connection. Using squid makes this really easy.

In firefox (librewolf) I have foxyproxy addon which allows you to specify a proxy to use for specific urls. So when I navigate to mytracker.com firefox automatically routes the connection through squid > wireguard > mullvad on my server.

wireguard_in

This handles my “road warrior” set up so I can access services on my home server while I’m away.

This container has a separate docker network to most of my other containers, in the ip subnet 10.0.2.0/24.

traefik

this is a reverse proxy

it’s on the same network as wireguard_in with the ip address 10.0.2.2

I’ve configured a public dns “A” record *.home.mydomain.com to point to 10.0.2.2, the private ip address.

The configurations I use for the wireguard connections on my phone or other devices only route requests for this subnet through the wireguard connection. so if I’m away from home and my phone requests lemmy.world that goes through the public network, but if I request photon.home.mydomain.com that goes through my vpn. This way you don’t need to turn off / on the wireguard connection.

I use file based configurations for traefik. It can do docker label configurations but they’re just awful IMO. The yaml configurations are much more readable and manageable.

As an aside, you can replicate this structure many times on one host. I have several incoming wireguard networks for different purposes. You configure the traefik container to sit across all the networks, like a spider at the centre of a web.

Yeah, you’re right in that wealthy people are heavily motivated to capture the value provided by new technologies.

However, I don’t think that’s always the case.

Roof top solar is one example. Really high rates of adoption here in Australia. The cost of the equipment has reduced dramatically and it’s a bit silly not to install at this point. It’s good for the planet and it reduces costs for individuals and families of all kinds.

Food production is another one. Yes a lot of farms are owned by large corporations, but a lot of farms are also family operations. If they make more food they make more money and secondary industries can charge farmers more money. In my area this agricultural production is the primary industry and although there might be $100k people in my city almost all employment is in supporting industries, whether that’s maintaining equipment, transporting goods, financial services, et cetera. While there’s always some concentration of wealth it doesn’t seam particularly problematic for the moment.

I don’t really know anything about this but it’s possible that in the future you’ll be able to make synthetic meats at home in a bioreactor.

I guess I’m just saying that while I agree the implications of climate change are bleak, emerging technologies might mitigate the impact on human-kind to some extent.

I guess it’s subjective.

Sure, climate change is starting to have an impact and more people might die due to malnutrition which is related.

My predictions within 5 years are something like :

• intensifying weather events like floods, storms, cyclones / hurricanes, to a point where insurance becomes a real unavoidable problem, putting trillions of dollars of real estate at risk.
• intensifying weather events like droughts where some traditionally viable agricultural areas no longer are, maybe a 10% reduction of arable land in any given region.
• localised famine events generating a few hundred thousand climate change refugees per year.
• increasing commercial interest in arable land in regions less likely to be impacted, farm values doubling in some areas
• increasing political interest in arable land in these same regions, with escalating political tension

I think societal collapse is still a decade away at least. However, the poor and impoverished are certainly going to start to feel the burn.

On the one hand I have a left leaning progressive mind set and have with young children - I’m heavily motivated to try to change our trajectory. On the other hand I’m 43 years old and I don’t remember a period where people weren’t predicting societal collapse in 5 years.

Climate change is bad. Mass extinctions, severe weather events, and famine, are all a certainty in the coming years. However, this needs to be balanced by technological advancements that are going to mitigate the effects. Just as an example, we can produce more food from less land than ever in history.

I’d never heard of the XY Problem before.

I get it - big opportunity to waste lots of time.

However, while I’ve never posted a question on stack overflow or similar, a common complaint is that it’s a toxic community because of responses related to this problem - a user asks about X and is accused of asking about Y and most responses undermine the premise being question Z.

I have been fiddling with trying to build a Dockerfile and container