It’s a common dictionary, which is probably not very good in this context. I think it would be more appropriate to refer to ISTQB, as it is likely the most relevant source when it comes to software testing and failures:

Human beings make errors (mistakes), which produce defects (faults, bugs), which in turn may result in failures. Humans make errors for various reasons, such as time pressure, complexity of work products, processes, infrastructure or interactions, or simply because they are tired or lack adequate training

Or to put it simple:

We’re seeing a failure here.

It’s just git isn’t good/perfect software. Best pieces of software are made within a week.

Why did it take six months to resolve the issue? What steps did you take, how did they respond? Serious claims require proper explanation at the very least.

passed

I too heard about such meetings. I’m yet to participate in one though.

A president doesn’t need to be awesome, he or she needs to be competent.

There’s still no light theme, you can’t upload videos, screenshots on your feed take like 20% of the screen with no proper full-screen view (it opens another window after two clicks that you have to close later), likes and comments don’t sync well between the friends feed and the game feed, and this list goes on and on. Steam client is far from fantastic. It’s a half-baked product with inconsistent user experience.

ML in action.

That’s strange. A lot of people from Russia continue contributing on GitHub without any issues.