

I’d suggest “vorzeichnenbehaftete Ganzzahl” (maybe vbGanz) and “vorzeichenlose Ganzzahl” (vlGanz) 🤣 please don’t make that a thing
I’d suggest “vorzeichnenbehaftete Ganzzahl” (maybe vbGanz) and “vorzeichenlose Ganzzahl” (vlGanz) 🤣 please don’t make that a thing
Does that get translated if someone else with a different language opens that file?
Could be because Ganz is short for Ganzzahl and a noun.
Don’t use floats when you need to get accurate stuff
Floats are accurate. Could you name a situation (except money) where you think floats are not accurate enough to handle it?
Sure, just asign them a random Greek letter and call it a day 🤣
Not only for audio, but everything that doesn’t have to be an exact base 10 representation (like money). Anything that represents something “analog” or “measured” is perfectly fine to store in a float. Temperature, humidity, windspeed, car velocity, rocket acceleration, etc. Calculations with floats are perfectly accurate and given the same bit length are as accurate as decimal types. The only thing they can’t do is exactly(!) represent base 10 decimals but for a very large amount of applications that doesn’t matter.
That’s not really true and it depends on what you mean. If your decimal datatype has the same number of bits it’s not more accurate than base 2 floats. This is often hidden because many decimal implementations aren’t 64 bit but 128 bit or more. But what it can do is exactly represent base 10 numbers which is not a requirement for a lot of applications.
You can use floats everywhere where you don’t need numbers to be base 10. With base 2 floats the operations couldn’t be more accurate given the limit of 64 bits. But if you write f64 x = 0.1;
and one assumes that the computer somehow stored 0.1
inside x they already made a wrong assumption. 0.1 can’t be converted into a float because it’s a periodic in base 2. A very very pedantic compiler wouldn’t even let you compile that and force you to pick a value that actually can be represented.
Down the rabbit hole: https://zeta.one/floats-are-not-inaccurate/
But that’s not because floats are inaccurate. A very very pedantic compiler wouldn’t even let you write f64 x = 0.1;
because 0.1 (and also 0.2 and 0.3) can’t be converted to a float exactly (note that 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, etc. can be stored exactly!)
The moment you write f64 x = 0.1;
and expect the computer to store that inside a float you already made a wrong assumption. What the computer actually stores is the float value that is as close as possible to 0.1. But not because floats are inaccurate, but because floats are base 2. Note that floating point types in general don’t have to be base 2 - they can be any base (for example decimal types are base 10) but IEEE754 floats are base 2, because it allows for simpler hardware implementations.
An even more pedantic compiler would only let you write floating point in binary like 10.10110001b
and let you do the conversation, because it would make it blatantly obvious that most base 10 decimals can’t even be converted without information loss. So the “inaccuracy” is not(!) because float calculations are inaccurate but because many people wrongly assume that the base 10 literal they wrote can be stored inside a float.
Floats are actually really accurate (ignoring some Intel FPU hardware bugs). I skipped a lot of details which you can find here: https://zeta.one/floats-are-not-inaccurate/
Equipped with that knowledge your calculation 0.1+0.2 != 0.3
can simply be translated into: “The closest float to 0.1” + “The closest float to 0.2” is not equal to “The closest float to 0.3”. Keep in mind that the addition itself is perfectly accurate and without any error/rounding(!) on every EEE754 conforming implementation.
I think they did that in castles, because it’s generally pretty hard to build castles. If the enemy is inside the walls you are practically done anyway.
Sounds like an urban legend. Who do you mean anyway? James Couzens? Harry Bennett? Charles Sorensen? His son Edsel? They all died of natural causes.
There are a lot of YouTubers just playing with them, but I think Jim Browning is the only one actually taking them down.
OC is probably from an EU county where everything has to normalized to p. 100g because everything else is just insane.
It doesn’t matter because they show the images to multiple people and even shift the images around. If a square is only halfway there some people will click it, some won’t and this way you can generate some sort of heat map which is all you need to label your training data.
There is very likely some step to sit on 🤣. To empty the water you just need a hose and do the same trick people use to steal gasoline (or a pump if you want to be fast and fancy).
That’s exactly what I did and never looked back. Just installed code-server + a few vs code plugins. Automatically synced via some some scripts that push and pull+merge git commits, done. No need for one of those million note taking apps. I also installed polyglot notebooks for vs code to embed code into notes.
The joke is because of “degrees” (also to measure angles) and “radians”
Joules is unfortunately a vector because it’s over a distance in a direction.
What? Joule is an energy unit and energy is a scalar quantity and not a vector. There is no “energy direction” and no “distance”.
Edit: even your edit doesn’t make sense. Provide a source that says that energy or joule is somehow a vector.
I’m pretty sure it’s not
FALLS()
butWENN()
, at least the last time I used Excel.