• HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      120
      ·
      1 year ago

      My understanding is that you didn’t see your career advance in Google if you maintained an existing product, only if you launched new ones. So, there is an internal bias in development teams to create new products while not keeping them around.

      In some cases, this would encourage Google developers to relaunch products rather than improve existing products.

      • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        1 year ago

        All those closings and new launches also helps with reducing that pesky user base, get burnt a few times by Google and Microsoft looks much better.

    • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Google is not an endpoint if you wanna be a money-laden tech bro. To get real cash you gotta create a startup and grift some money out of VCs. To do that, it helps if you “innovated something totally new” at someplace with name recognition like Google.

      Everything except search and ads are simply practice grifts before the real grift. You cannot rely on any Google product to last for any length of time, even properties Google purchases will lose reliability as they fall into disrepair and neglect, see Nest.

      I used to love Google everything, I was on the wave beta. I was one of the first with a cr-48. It is sad for those of us that want to contribute to something big, cool, and impactful, watch for fuschia to implode next, I think it already started when they “had” to layoff “over hires.”

      One or two person teams don’t put a man on the moon. It takes a lot of really smart people working on very small specific things together to make world changing stuff happen, the culture of Big Tech is not conducive to “real” work anymore. It’s big grifts run by little grifters.

      • Scary le Poo@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The moment Google did the alphabet thing in order to preempt ftc breakups, it was over.

        I degoogled in 2017 (I run my own Synology cloud now with off-site backup to AWS glacier) and while it wasn’t cheap, it was absolutely the best decision.

        • AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m working on moving to local control as much as possible for my smart home stuff. Switched to zwave for my thermostat from nest, excellent move, I don’t lose connection (and automations) randomly anymore.

          Also ripping all my optical media for jellyfin to avoid relying on these assholes deleting stuff from their streaming catalogs for tax breaks.

          It’s not just google, it’s all of these companies.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I met someone at a party who works at Google. She told me that too many decisions are made by engineers instead of like a higher up product person.

        That’s not contradicting what you said. Others have also said there’s a lot more rewards for making something “new” rather than maintaining something.

        It’s a failure of Google management

    • EinfachUnersetzlich@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 year ago

      Microsoft does too. Every time I log in to Azure (or Intune, or Defender, or Microsoft 365 or whatever they’re all called these days) for work something has changed names. The documentation usually isn’t updated to reflect the changes.

  • phorq@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    Español
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a Google Workspace user, I recommend going off the grid somewhere streetview can’t find you…

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      1 year ago

      Enterprises usually need/want additional features, customizations or guarantees, like for example:

      • integration of a Single Sign-On system
      • on-premise hosting
      • Service-Level Agreement for the availability of the service
        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not the stuff us plebs use for free, businesses tend to have support contracts

    • sanzky@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      this is incredible common. in software offerings, an enterprise account per user can be twice or more the price of an “individual one”. eg. an individual intelliJ license is 200€ for the first year and 600€ for the enterprise one