• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I have CDs that I burned in the 90s that still work fine. I’m assuming the blu-rays I burn now will probably last as long, which is decades longer than I need them to.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I heard that the higher the data density on DVD and BR means the higher the failure rate. Though i have no real evidence of that myself.

      Maybe one or two bits corrupted here or there will only cause some unnoticeable artefacts anyway.

    • Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Music CDs or data? Music CDs have built-in error correction, data CDs don’t. You can certainly extend the lifetime if they’re stored in the dark in a cool, dry place (UV light, heat, and humidity all damage the dye that gets burned to encode them) but they’re not reliable archival storage without error correction.

      • socsa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Data CDs actually use even more robust error correction since they use interleaving in addition to FEC since they don’t need to scan in “real time”

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Music. I have some data CDs I burned in the mid 2000s, that I booted up a few years ago (Linux live CDs). I don’t have any data CDs from the 90s though. IIRC, ISO 9660 does have error correction.

        Edit: I just looked it up. ISO 9660 doesn’t have error correction, but the underlying system, CD-ROM Mode 1, does have error correction.