Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoRealized 99% of all my chargers are USB-C. This can only mean one thing. New USB bout to drop!message-squaremessage-square298linkfedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1message-squareRealized 99% of all my chargers are USB-C. This can only mean one thing. New USB bout to drop!Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Showerthoughts@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square298linkfedilink
minus-squarejaykrown@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·edit-21 month agoTrue, I appreciate the correction, the actual data transfer speed is determined by the USB version.
minus-squareMisterFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·1 month agoI will never forgive USB for the ridiculous naming
minus-squareBenchamoneh@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 month agoAgree, it’s a total trainwreck
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 month ago480mbps is still faster than shitty cloud services edit: yes I know about usb 1.0 and 1.1
minus-squareSamskara@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 month agoUSB 1.0 barely got any traction. I have never seen a device in the wild. USB 1.1 exploded in use and was fantastic compared to the mess before. It was fast enough for most file sizes at the time. USB 2.0 is still very usable today.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoUuuhhhhh, copilot, is that you?!
True, I appreciate the correction, the actual data transfer speed is determined by the USB version.
I will never forgive USB for the ridiculous naming
Agree, it’s a total trainwreck
480mbps is still faster than shitty cloud services
edit: yes I know about usb 1.0 and 1.1
USB 1.0 barely got any traction. I have never seen a device in the wild.
USB 1.1 exploded in use and was fantastic compared to the mess before. It was fast enough for most file sizes at the time.
USB 2.0 is still very usable today.
Uuuhhhhh, copilot, is that you?!