So basically i want try other rolling release distributions besides Vanilla Arch Linux So Give your thoughts on which is the best and also how to install the wifi drivers on Endeavour os and Gentoo Linux For a better experience
OpenSUSE Tumbleweed
And if it does, roll back to the previous snapshot.
Haven’t needed to since I switched my GPU to AMD, but it’s nice to know it’s there. I’ve used it a few times though, and it’s quick and easy.
I love openSUSE Tumbleweed. It has a solid automated testing process that means packages will be held back rather than updating and breaking things.
Debian hands down delivers the most stable experience of em all – even after updating from stable to sid.
t. Did exactly that on a unsupported sbc, “Orange pi zero 3”, and everything works.
thanks but Debain isn’t easy to use
…wait what
So you think Gentoo is okay but Debian isnt?
I was guessing but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t work And yes I know Debain is easy nowadays but regardless I will try Debain or even better MX Linux and Linux mint Debain edition
Delving into the realm of non-rolling distros, yes MX is quite good (sits on top of Debian). I’ve used the latest version on a laptop seeing almost daily use for 1.5 years or so and zero issues. And thread originator is correct, Debian is the gold standard for a stable linux experience.
that’s why I want to try it later because it’s the really Best Distro for most of my old computers that otherwise use puppy or antix
Have you considered a fixed release in combination with rolling applications (i. e. Flatpak, Snap)?
If you choose Fedora (preferably one of the atomic variants, like Silverblue), you would also get a rolling kernel and rolling KDE Plasma desktop, so overall the experience can be quite close to a rolling release distribution if you install the desktop applications via Flatpak.
Ubuntu “interim” (non-LTS) releases are usually also fairly current and could be a good choice if you don’t mind Snap. There’s also the option of following the Ubuntu “devel” branch, which always refers to the current pre-release version of Ubuntu (e. g. 24.04 at the moment) and is rolling.
Just wanted to give you a different direction to think about. ;)
thanks I haven’t known about it but I have Opensuse Tumbleweed for gaming use and endeavour os for the aur
Depending on what you want, OpenSUSE’s OBS is a great alternative to the AUR. It works by building software given a script, so you still just download binary packages, unlike the AUR where you download build scripts.
I honestly haven’t needed much since switching from Arch to openSUSE, though I’ve played with some OBS packages here and there. I used to maintain some AUR packages, and I haven’t needed to on Tumbleweed.
Give it a shot, you probably don’t need both. I prefer Tumbleweed these days, but I’ve used Tumbleweed and Arch both for about the same amount of time (5-ish years) and can recommend both.
Just FYI, if you like EndeavourOS, you should know that it’s essentially an installer for Vanilla Arch (unlike Majaro which is Arch-based).
So you may have just had bad luck when you tried Vanilla Arch that you didn’t have with EndeavourOS – but there’s no real difference between the 2 besides manual vs GUI installer.
I’d say Tumbleweed is what you’re looking for. They have some sort of automated testing process (OpenQA, I think) and are far more stable than Arch, while oftentimes having newer versions of packages before Arch.
What about the gaming benefits like using Lutris and Steam Proton In case i want to game after i installed all the necessary drivers
I use both on Tumbleweed and they work fine.
Both should work similarly regardless of distribution.
ok thanks for your wonderful help
Arch
what about endeavour os then
It’s literally arch with a graphical installer…
Arch
Yeah but it breaks down alot so its not for me unfortunately
Debian stable
Liquorix kernel
Flatpak the apps
Why mess with the kernel? The standard one works fine and you’re likely looking at 1-2% difference either way.
Also, stable isn’t rolling, that’s in the name.
Liquorix and Zen kernels have different cpu scheduler which makes them more responsive for desktop usage under heavy load.
Theoretically this reduces throughput but it’s barely measurable, compared to the noticeably better responsiveness.
I doubt it’s as noticeable as you make it out to be. I use the default kernel shipped with OpenSUSE Tumbleweed and the system is acceptably responsive while under load, with the main exception being low memory situations (i.e. heavy swap usage). But I expect the Zen scheduler to have similar issues.
Then again, I probably have more tolerance for poor responsiveness because I rarely run my system to its limits (unless compiling) and rarely interact with other apps while playing games.
It’s only been noticeable while compiling and looking at animations. It might also just be placebo or I’m misremembering since it’s been many months since I “tested” it.
It wasn’t my intention to make it sound like it’s a giant improvement. It’s marginal but if it’s simple to install I’d say go for it.
I’ve been running the same arch install for atleast 5 years… I honestly can’t recommend any other distro because I haven’t used many for a long enough period of time
Ok but I won’t use stable distributions until im need to use them and how did not crash from maintenance and downloaded too many softwares
I also used Arch for 5+ years and had very few issues. If you know what you’re doing, it’s not hard to keep it running stable.
I’m now on Tumbleweed and have even fewer issues.
But honestly, what’s wrong with stable distros? I recommend them by default because there’s far less chance for anything to go wrong day to day, and your only concern is at release time. I switched because I’m a developer and using the latest is better for me so I can test on the latest versions of things. I also prefer to fix things as I go instead of potentially lose a day to a release upgrade going sideways (happened twice, once with Ubuntu and again with Fedora).
Btw, Tumbleweed is great because it configures snapper by default, which let’s you roll back if an upgrade goes poorly. I’ve used it a few times over 2-3 years, mostly when my NVIDIA driver got mismatched from the kernel. I’m now on an AMD GPU and haven’t needed it since.
I’m curious – what’s your motivation for doing this?
Why do you want to use a rolling release over something built for gaming?
Because i want the latest drivers and packages plus stable distributions are mostly outdated
Because i want the latest drivers and packages
Why do you want that over a stable system that’s been curated for gaming?
I know nobara is good but it’s by a single dev
Not really – it’s Fedora with a handful of gaming add-ons curated by arguably the top name in Linux gaming.
Ok null but I wish it has More Devs in case of maintaining it in addition to adding updates to gaming software
Regardless, I’m still not getting why you’d want an unstable gaming experience over a stable one.
Ok its because of my trust on the fedora after redhat closing up their source code and making it paid and they’re adding telemetry in fedora 45 and up so that’s why i have left fedora
Give void a try, setup was pretty easy for a more diy style distro.
But is void a really good choice for gaming
There are Nvidia drivers and steam in the nonfree repo (it’s a one command to get access to it), they are easy to install. I haven’t tried any gaming but don’t see why it wouldn’t be just as good as any other distro.
Thanks again dude i will check if void is comparable to arch and opensuse tumbleweed plus giving you my thoughts later
Good luck in your search!
Long time arch user (amazing distro). Recently moved to Fedora Kinoite to try it out. I like it so far.
Ok thanks but why not use bazzite its way better for Gaming
Cause those are nothing more then distros that come with some prepackeged apps. Nothing I can’t easily do myself and prefer more vanilla experience and minimal bloat distros.
just use arch and don’t do anything stupid (like not updating regularly)
I don’t know how there are people that wait a month between updates, it’s like they don’t actually want a rolling release.
As someone who used Arch for several years and has been on Tumbleweed for a few years now, life happens. I ran Arch on my laptop, desktop, and a server, and I could go weeks if not 1-2 months between actively using one of those. But when I do, I want the latest software.
So I now use Tumbleweed on my desktop and laptop and Leap on my server. Updates are no longer painful whether it’s been a week or a month. I also switched to AMD GPU, which further reduced my issues.
I think Arch is fine, Tumbleweed just fits my lifestyle more. I’ll probably move my server to MicroOS one of these days, probably when Leap 15.6 EOL is announced.
life happens
Impossible! Everyone knows Arch users don’t have a life. /j
But damn you have a pretty computer free life if you can go weeks between usage.
I have a work computer, Steam Deck, and video game console as well. Sometimes I just don’t get around to using my desktop PC or laptop.
I also have kids, and they use my computers more than I do (mostly Minecraft). But I don’t personally use them every day (usually 1-2x/week, if that), and I don’t run updates every time I use my computer. I do try to remember to update them once/week (usually Saturdays), but that doesn’t happen very consistently.
And then there are vacations and whatnot (e.g. we went on a family trip for 3 weeks last year). Life gets busy, and mine doesn’t revolve around my computers, my computers are merely tools I use to play games, work on personal projects, and sometimes watch shows.
Debian testing or unstable.
Ok do you know sparkly Linux is great rolling distribution in addition to pclinux os
I mean it’s not really rolling, but since this is Linux Gaming, I recommend checking out Nobara Linux. It’s a Fedora fork made by GloriousEggroll of the proton-GE fame. It’s the easiest Linux gaming experience I’ve had so far, at least with the non-modified Gnome version.
IMHO, you should avoid KDE – I’ve had nothing but bad experiences there – but if that’s your favourite poison go ahead.
It’s always really interesting seeing how people can have completely different experiences with kde and gnome!
I have had nothing but a great experience with kde for years but every time I’ve tried gnome it’s always been a buggy experience!
Yeah, I wonder about that too sometimes. Perhaps a matter of hardware choices or just plain taste.
thanks but I comfortable with using rolling release Distros for Gaming
Sure. Rolling distros aren’t an “advanced form” of Linux though, just different.
