• letraset@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s great that Bluesky is gaining traction, but how sure are we that it won’t turn to shit before other relays come online and make it actually decentralised?

    • peregrin5@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      We aren’t sure. It’s still a billionaire owned social media. For some reason people are too afraid of the freedom actual decentralized social media gives them and they want a billionaire behind the scenes running everything and coralling them to the correct opinions.

      • Godort@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        It’s not fear of the freedom, it’s choice paralysis. People want to go to one website, sign up for one account and then be part of a network with absolutely zero research beforehand. I like the fediverse, but the barrier to entry is higher than that because it first requires you to understand the technology at a base level.

        Internet services getting shitty and then dying is nothing new. Look at MySpace, Digg, or any BBS. people just abandon the old one and join the new popular one. They’ll leave when it gets shitty enough and join the new thing

        • peregrin5@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          I think it’s also a lack of tech understanding. I know how easy it is to fork a repo so I get how great the fediverse is with all the services being FOSS and anyone can create an instance. This major benefit makes no sense to someone who doesn’t even know what a git repo is or the difference between free (but you are the product being sold) and FOSS.

        • Baggins@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Right, so we just trade in our relatives for some new ones.

          That’s the attitude that puts people off.

          • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            At some point you have to jump ship and follow what fits you and your needs/wants in terms of security, morality (in the context of Meta and its complete lack of ethics), etc. You can try and get folks to try other platforms but most of them will inevitably fall back to what they know and never leave. I’m not going to keep Facebook around on the off chance that one relative needs to reach out. The relatives willing to actually make an effort can already text or call me and vice versa.

            This whole billionaire social media prison is not something I’m willing to keep destroying my mental health on over some “blood is thicker than water” bs.

            • Baggins@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yeah I get that, it’s why I don’t use FB anymore. I keep WhatsApp for close family though. They’re is no other option. And dont tell me to use text. Doesn’t cut it.

              • orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                Oh, no I get it. I went to Chile a few years ago and it made me realize how truly big the WhatsApp community was in South America. It was on billboards, buildings; it’s become a necessity.